![]() ![]() The fact you don't need anything but the Micro, is actually, imho a big benefit, And, it sounds better than that NUX. The MM is set to a set of non changeable amps, with a particular set of effects for each. But you can only have 4 on the device at a time/ But, as I said, you have to dial those in for a particular set of headphones (and guitar really). Via the app, you have access to a bunch of different amp models, and effects on the NUX. Without using the app, and adjusting the 4 presets you load on the Nux, to be the right volume for a particular set of headphones, it can be too loud, or way to low for a particular set of headphones. ![]() I contacted Fender who was no help at all. The bass control will not change the bass level of any preset. It is also, imho what makes the MM superior to the Nux Mighty Plug. Im new to the forum and looking to see if anyone has had the same issue that Im having with my Mustang III amp All of the controls work all of the tone settings eg. Fender has set out to raise its digital modelling game with this 100-watt evolution of the Mustang amp line but does it have the tone to match its. It easily adjusts for any impedance, and can drive some really high impedance headphones. At least the 25 has an 8 inch speaker, which is what the old Vibro Champs came with and you can get decent volume out of an 8 inch speaker, just not much low end. All too often with modelling headphone taps, you need reaaly good flat cans, particularly of a certain impedance. I've never used any Fender Mustang modeling amps, but I would be a little concerned with the 4 inch speakers in the 40. It sounded varying degrees of great on any of them. ![]() When I first got mine, I tried it with a wide range of headphones, from Koss sporta pros, Low end monitor up to really good Beyers. It's not the #1 amp in sales on Reverb, for 2021 for nothing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |